Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Appolon v. The et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Esterlin Appolon
Defendant:
Kevin The, Chris Magus, Marco Borboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon v. Napier et al
as 4:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Esterlin Appolon
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Unknown Arnold, Pima County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berlyne Appolon v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-15435
Petitioner:
BERLYNE APPOLON
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Appolon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv02275
Plaintiff:
Andre Jr. Appolon
Defendant:
Nadia Arabi, Teresa Buccolz, Director John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Appolon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ernst Appolon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon v. Holder
as 14-1351
Petitioner:
RALPH APPOLON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Appolon et al v. Lamberti et al
as 0:2012cv61049
Plaintiff:
Maude Appolon and Ganel Appolon
Defendant:
Alfred T. Lamberti, John Doe1, John Doe2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Helmick, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01136
Plaintiff:
Jean Achille, Gladys Appolon, Yva Audelin and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc. and others
Helmick, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22492
Plaintiff:
Timothy Helmick, , Maria Helmick , Reinaldo Felipe Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
