Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Branford v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
United States of America, C.O. John Doe One and Two, Lieutenant Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Branford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Roberson v. State of Texas, et al
as 19-20262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CARDORA ROBERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
INMATE FNU BRANFORD, STATE OF TEXAS and MEDICAL STAFF, at Holliday Unit
BRANFORD v. BELL
as 2:2019cv00131
Petitioner:
JERMAINE BRANFORD
Respondent:
J. R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawrence Williams v. Calvin Weller, et al
as 19-20138
Defendant / Appellee:
TAYLOR J. GREEDES, KATE M. BUCKMASTER, JAMES S. COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE C. WILLIAMS
Branford v. Washington County Police Officers Association et al
as 3:2018cv02127
Defendant:
Bryan E. Danner, Robert Lorenz Zimkas, Brad King and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Branford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roberson v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2018cv01524
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Medical Staff and FNU Branford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00377
Defendant:
Inmate FNU Branford, Medical Staff and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moret v. Garrett et al
as 3:2018cv00096
Defendant:
A. Ashenfelter, R. Bose, Branford and others
Movant:
Benjamin Barber
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weller et al
as 4:2017cv03905
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Williams
Defendant:
Calvin Weller, Curtis D. Bridges, Jr., Charles H. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino v. Branford et al
as 3:2017cv01828
Plaintiff:
Ralph L Marino
Defendant:
Town of Branford , Thomas F Mahoney , Shaun Heffernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
