Cases 31 - 40 of 139
HARVIN et al v. CARVANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
SYRETTA ANGELIQUE HARVIN, DAVID WEAVER, JR, JOSEPH A RIEDEL and others
Defendant:
CARVANA LLC, BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY LLC, ALLY BANK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wright v. BridgeCrest Credit Company, LLC
as 2:2023mi00001
Plaintiff:
Kaili Charise Wright
Defendant:
BridgeCrest Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Miller v. Bridgecrest et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Duhjuan L Miller
Defendant:
Bridgecrest and Daniel Gaudreau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McAllister v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
as 2:2023cv10581
Plaintiff:
Dana McAllister
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Saddler v. Carvana, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation and Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
