Cases 31 - 40 of 280
Aaron et al v. AETNA et al
as 1:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Marguette National Life Insurance Company, Medicaid Coventry Care Coventry Health Care, Blue Cross Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00600
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brophy v. National General Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01936
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company and National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brophy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jolly et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Glanzer Floyd Jolly, Anthony Taylor, Peter Optekar and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06171
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schneider v. Natera, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
John Harvey Schneider
Defendant:
Natera, Inc., Steve Chapman, Michael Brophy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
