Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Beville v. Taylor Wharton Cryogenics LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
Theresa A. Beville
Defendant:
Taylor Wharton Cryogenics LLC , Kathleen Parker, Ben Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Bryer v. Conoco Phillips Co et al
as 5:2015cv01218
Plaintiff:
Charles Bryer
Defendant:
Conoco Phillips Co and Phillips 66 Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bryer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, ALAW et al
as 5:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Linda Bryer
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, ALAW , U.S. Bank National Association and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Pries v. Spokane Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Brandon C Pries
Defendant:
Spokane Police Department, Toby Bryer, Joseph Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryer v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02252
Plaintiff:
George Bryer
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
