Cases 31 - 40 of 465
MITCHELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv00975
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHALMERS C. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10951
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Edwards et al
as 2:2020cv03142
Defendant:
Oneil Mitchell, John Bel Edwards, Ruben Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Wardell Simmons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
O'Mara et al v. STL Direct Mechanical, LLC
as 4:2020cv01616
Plaintiff:
Michael J. O'Connell, III, Plumbers and Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund, Neil G. Haberberger and others
Defendant:
STL Direct Mechanical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'Mara et al v. Bob Raeker Plumbing CO.
as 4:2020cv01573
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Mitchell, Plumbers and Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund, Neil G. Haberberger and others
Defendant:
Bob Raeker Plumbing CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mitchell v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01035
Defendant:
Tommy James, FNU Ford, Eugene Frost and others
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lezmond Mitchell v. USA
as 20-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEZMOND C. MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Lezmond Mitchell
as 20-99009
Defendant / Appellant:
LEZMOND C. MITCHELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
