Cases 31 - 40 of 138
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John C. Richards v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company PG and E et al
as 5:2017cv00471
Defendant:
Does and Pacific Gas and Electric Company PG and E
Plaintiff:
John C. Richards
Leon Morris v. C. Richards, et al
as 17-15193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON EUGENE MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. RICHARDS, G. WHITTED, SPANGLER and others
Roman et al v. Leibert et al
as 3:2016cv01988
Plaintiff:
Louis Roman, Heather Lindsay, Sally Vollenweider and others
Defendant:
Richard M. Leibert, Bruce Fair, Ben Staskiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mitchell et al v. Keeney Manufacturing Company, The
as 6:2016cv01759
Plaintiff:
Stacey D Mitchell , C Richard Dobbins and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Keeney Manufacturing Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00869
Plaintiff:
MARIA C. RICHARDS
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICA BACKGROUND/INTERSECTIONS INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gray v. Richard
as 1:2016cv00941
Petitioner:
Marion Gray, Jr.
Respondent:
Rhonda C. Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richards et al v. Capital Partners Funding Group, Inc.
as 2:2016mc00069
Petitioner:
Paul C. Richards and Stephen P. Williams
Defendant:
Capital Partners Funding Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Richards et al
as 2:2016at00340
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Richards and Stephen P. Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Crandall v. PTC Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10471
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crandall
Defendant:
PTC Inc. , James Heppelmann , Jeffrey Glidden and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
