Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Cadence Bank v. Monroe Park Properties LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Defendant:
Monroe Park Properties LLC, H4IT Birmingham LLC, Paul Monroe Mielke, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cadence Bank v. Bank of America, N. A.
as 4:2023cv02959
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Heron Lakes 2005 HQ-7 v. Cadence Bank
as 23-20374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Heron Lakes 2005 HQ-7, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cadence Bank, successor by merger to BancorpSouth Bank
Cadence Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and EIG Investment Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Larry Muldrow v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 23-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Muldrow
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, Hempstead County, Arkansas, Miller County, Arkansas and others
Cadence Bank v. Dusansky
as 2:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Defendant:
Eric Dusansky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Hatfield v. Cadence Bank et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Akilah E. Hatfield
Defendant:
Cadence Bank, Shane Smith and Bailey Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cadence Bank v. Heritage Family Offices LLP
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank and BancorpSouth Bank
Defendant:
Heritage Family Offices LLP
Tippett-Rhodes et al v. Cadence Bank et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00124
Defendant:
Cadence Bank, Bancorp South, State Farm General Insurance Companies and others
Plaintiff:
Latanya Tippett-Rhodes, Chardai Rhodes and Ivan Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
