Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Johnathan Pinney v. Johnathan James, et al
as 19-3641
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Brown, State Attorney, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County, Foster, Judge, Van Buren and Faulkner County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Smith v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01328
Defendant:
Teri Kennedy, . Brown, . Miester and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Parole Board et al
as 2:2019cv12634
Defendant:
Parole Board, Chad Brown and Theodore Johnson
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pinney v. James et al
as 4:2019cv00509
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant:
Lucas Emberton, Schamoon, Johnathan James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00814
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Chad Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnathan Pinney v. Chris Waring, et al
as 19-2173
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Brown, State's Attorney, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County, Dallas Clark, Code Enforcement Officer, Fairfield Bay and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Acosta v. Chad C. Brown Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01941
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Chad C. Brown Inc., Chad C. Brown and Chad C. Brown Inc. doing business as Chad Brown Racing doing business as Chad Brown Racing Stables, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bowman v. Kochel et al
as 1:2019cv01082
Defendant:
Tina M Farr, Troy Davis, Guy D Pierce, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Waring et al
as 4:2019cv00138
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant:
Dallas Clark, Mark Roddenberry, Lucas Emberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
