Cases 31 - 40 of 237
Miller et al v. Eckerson et al
as 5:2020cv06012
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Miller and Amy Miller
Defendant:
Sheriff Joshua Quinn Eckerson and Harrison County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC v. MAHON et al
as 1:2019cv00499
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, PALISADES COLLECTION LLC and others
Defendant:
KIMBERLY J MAHON and CHARLES P MILLER
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al v. Delchi Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01891
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Moore, NNVI Investment LLC, Lillian P. Lapa and others
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Miller et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05801
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Miller and Patricia Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Miller, II v. USA
as 19-2339
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. MILLER, II
Miller et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03819
Plaintiff:
Charles H Miller and Lori L Baughman-Miller
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Hardaway
as 2:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Anthony Nelson Hardaway
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00692
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Miller
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Charles Miller, II v. USA
as 19-1147
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. MILLER, II
Charles Miller, II v. USA
as 19-1090
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. MILLER, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
