Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Ohan v. Rettig
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Festus O. Ohan
Defendant:
Charles Rettig and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Palmieri v. Nostdahl et al
as 1:2021cv03223
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mark Palmieri
Defendant:
Debra Nostdahl, Charles Retlig, Debra Nostdahl (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASSOCIATION OF AIR MEDICAL SERVICES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv03031
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AIR MEDICAL SERVICES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Franklin v. United States
as 21-11104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Franklin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, Charles Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Michael Pompeo and others
ESTATE OF JOHNSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04597
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MARK COPOULOS doing business as BRUCHA HOLDINGS REALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hale v. Rettig et al
as 2:2021cv01904
Plaintiff:
Robert H Hale
Defendant:
Charles Rettig and Suzy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laurent v. Yost et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Leo Laurent
Defendant:
Landon Yost, Steven Munchin and Charles Rettig
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
