Cases 31 - 39 of 39
ARSAD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04244
Plaintiff:
WARREN ARSAD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHRIS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DD IP HOLDING LLC v. 1169 Knollwood Road #2 LLC et al
as 7:2009cv07141
Plaintiff:
DD IP HOLDING LLC
Defendant:
1169 Knollwood Road #2 LLC, Montgomery Distributors LLC, Robert G. Delgadio, and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Thomas et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv11508
Plaintiff:
Chris Thomas, Shaheen Howlett, Linda Dennis and others
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Babson et al
as 5:2007ct03148
Plaintiff:
Adolph Garfield Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Zelma Babson, Dawn Gore, Brian Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman et al v. Auto Body Panels, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00486
Plaintiff:
Douglas W. Chapman, Douglas W. Chapman, Chris Thomas and others
Defendant:
Auto Body Panels, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Richeson v. Thomas
as 6:2007cv00168
Plaintiff:
Shawn A. Richeson
Defendant:
Chris Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00231
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00232
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Harris et al v. Yazoo County Board of Education et al
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harris, Clifton Haralson, Christine Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
Yazoo County Board of Education , W. C. Martin, E. H. Selby and others
Intervenor:
Rebecca Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
