Cases 31 - 40 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samuel Sigoloff v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-2137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SIGOLOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Individually and in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, ANTHONY R. HALE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commanding General of Fort Huachuca and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Savelkoul v. Wormuth
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Savelkoul
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GRIMSLEY v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. GRIMSLEY, III
Defendant:
LLOYD AUSTIN and CHRISTINE WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
NATIONAL RANGER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
The National Ranger Memorial Foundation and NATIONAL RANGER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Austin Lloyd, William Laplante and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
