Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Watson v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 3:2016mc00090
Plaintiff:
Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. and Francis Edward Joseph Wilde, III
Christopher Watson et al v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 2:2016mc00123
Plaintiff:
Intellectus, LLC and Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. and Francis Edward Joseph Wilde III
Watson et al v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 2:2016mc00121
Defendant:
Francis Edward Joseph Wilde III and Riptide Worldwide, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Intellectus, LLC and Christopher Watson
Christopher Watson et al v Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 8:2016mc00005
Plaintiff:
Intellectus, LLC and Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. and Frank Wilde
Seymour et al v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jerry Seymour and Priscilla Seymour
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett v. Spencer et al
as 3:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gerald Bennett
Defendant:
Cardan Spencer, Christopher Watson and City of Dallas, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Watson et al v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00217
Plaintiff:
Intellectus, LLC and Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. and Frank Wilde
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Matte-Watson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03328
Plaintiff:
Mistalyn Matte-Watson and Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watson v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc.
as 2:2012ms00099
Plaintiff:
Intellectus, LLC and Christopher Watson
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. and Frank Wilde
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
