Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Carlson et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-19605
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Carlson and Winton D. Carlson
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Daryise Earl v. Racine County Jail, et al
as 12-3900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYISE L. EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
RACINE COUNTY JAIL, ROBERT D. CARLSON, JAMES SHERIFF and others
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter G. Carlson et al
as 2:2012cv05749
Defendant:
Laurie D. Carlson, Peter G. Carlson, Does and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Carlson et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 0:2012cv01440
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Carlson and Kiersa A. Notz
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Clark v. Lindenmuth et al
as 2:2012cv12043
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
T Lindenmuth, Briggs, Catherine S Bauman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jason Saunders v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, KATHERINE FERNANDO, MARION MARUJO and others
CARLSON, et al v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
CARL I. CARLSON, III , EMILY D. CARLSON , LAURINDA S. CARLSON and others
Defendant:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mateo v. Corebine
as 10-4363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
J. Corebine, CorrecllOn Officer, John Does, CorrectIOn Officer, All members of extraction team and K. O'Connor, Correction Sergeant
Defendant - Appellee:
Scan D. Carlson, Correction OffIcer, R. Clerc, Correction Sergeant, Cell Extraction Team, all members and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
