Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Carroll, Jr v. Perez et al
as 2:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Denise Aguilar, Antoniewicz, David Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Kohath Katar Lamumba Carroll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00091
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Paul David Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hollander v. Garrett
as 17-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Den Hollander
Defendant - Appellee:
Major Elliott Garrett, CBS News reporter, Katharine Bear Tur, NBC News reporter, Charles David Todd, NBC moderator of Meet the Press and others
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEBAR et al v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR, ERIN MICHELLE ROSEBAR and MILTON J. TAYLOR-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS F. HOGAN, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN P. MARSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01166
Plaintiff:
Tracy David Brooks
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Charles Brooks v. Columbus L. Swoops, Jr.
as 17-50239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DAVID BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KELLY
BROOKS v. WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID BROOKS
Defendant:
WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA , RICHARD CHATMAN , THOMAS KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Bell et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Brooks
Defendant:
Oliver J Bell, Brad Livingston, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2016cv03252
Plaintiff:
David Brooks
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
