Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03416
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dixon et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00809
Plaintiff: David Dixon , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant: Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Chris's Portable Toilets, Inc.
as 8:2010cv02546
Plaintiff: David Dixon
Defendant: Chris's Portable Toilets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joe Randle, Jr. v. Wesley Pratt, et al
as 10-40145
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOE RICHARD RANDLE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: WESLEY PRATT, LYNWOOD COOK, JAMES DANHIEN and others
Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1994cv00671
Plaintiff: Vincent Cervantes , Steven G Williams , Alfred Yancy and others
Defendant: Michael Connolly , Marisela Montes , James W Nielsen and others
Amicu: California Attorneys for Criminal Justice , San Diego Criminal Defense Bar Association and Criminal Defense Lawyers Club of San Diego
Pecial_master: Chase Riveland, Virginia Morrison and Nancy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Kuykendall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-40018
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD V DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: KEN KUYKENDALL, Doctor, CURTIS LAWSON and DAVID DIXON
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dixon v. Donald, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-5587
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID DIXON
Defendant - Appellant: STEVEN L. DONALD, Individually
Defendant: HELEN KAE EDWARDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?