Cases 31 - 40 of 285
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
RANA v. SEVEN SMITH LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
ZEESHAN RANA
Defendant:
SEVEN SMITH LLC D/B/A DOMINOS PIZZA, CLIFTON W. DUNN, ANA C. RODRIQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Domino's Pizza Franchising LLC v. H&M Pizza, LLC, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOMINO'S PIZZA FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
H&M PIZZA, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO BALLINAS
Hammonds v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HAMMONDS
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Andre Nesbit v. Dominos Pizzas LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Andre Nesbit
Defendant:
Dominos Pizzas LLC, Jon Doe and Somerset County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Cherry v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 2:2023cv10059
Plaintiff:
Monica Cherry
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Domino's Pizza LLC v. 3900 Paradise Retail Owner SPE
as 2:2022cv02115
Plaintiff:
Domino's Pizza LLC
Defendant:
3900 Paradise Retail Owner SPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC v. h&m pizza, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv12681
Plaintiff:
Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
h&m pizza, LLC and Mario Ballinas
Eyre v. Barber et al
as 7:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Eyre
Defendant:
John Barber and Yellow Hammer Pizza of MD, LLC d/b/a Domino's Pizza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Alexander v. Dominos Pizza et al
as 3:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander
Defendant:
Dominos Pizza, Davis Pizza Enterprises, Brett Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
