Cases 31 - 40 of 46
US v. David Hick
as 11-7086
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID A. HICKS
Hicks v. Ratliff
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
David P. Hicks
Defendant:
Tommy Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al.
as 1:2011dp20827
Plaintiff:
Gail A. Hicks , David A. Hicks and DePuy, Inc.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company v. Hicks et al
as 4:2011cv02018
Defendant:
David O. Hicks, Matchless Geophysical Inc., Terra Energy Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01155
Petitioner:
David A. Hicks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tomsky v. Health Grades, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01962
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Tomsky
Defendant:
Health Grades, Inc., Kerry R. Hicks, Mats Wahlstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Hicks v. Johna Page, et al
as 10-30577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNA PAGE, ROY R HALL, M A BIANCO and others
Dewayle's International, Ltd. v. Hicks
as 1:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dewayle's International, Ltd.
Defendant:
David C. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dewayle's International, Ltd v. Williams Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dewayle's International, Ltd
Defendant:
Williams Industries, Inc. and David C. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Page et al
as 5:2010cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks
Defendant:
Johna Page, Roy R Hall, M A Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
