Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Doe v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2017cv04941
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, Ricardo Perez, David Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02014
Plaintiff:
Jarmond Johnson , James Abold , Cristhian Alcala and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIVINGSTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2017cv01987
Petitioner:
DAVID LIVINGSTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LIVINGSTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv01066
Petitioner:
DAVID LIVINGSTON
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00701
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
United States of America v. Livingston
as 17-91
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David Livingston, AKA Kenneth Maxwell, AKA Arnold Striggles, AKA John Michaels
Padilla v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2016cv07130
Petitioner:
Jose U. Padilla
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. David Livingston
as 15-6261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LIVINGSTON
Livingston et al v. Tyco Integrated Security LLC et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00284
Defendant:
Tyco Integrated Security LLC , ADT, LLC and ADT Security Services, LLC Johnson City, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
David Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
