Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,741
James v. Lumpkin
as 24-10141
Petitioner: Anthony Donnell James
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Barrow (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00613
Petitioner: Donnell Barrow
Respondent: J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Slay Jr v. Board of Education (Federal government et al
as 2:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: Donnell Slay Jr
Defendant: Board of Education (Federal government, Federal government + (NYS) and NYS Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Donnell E Adams
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Murphy v. Nishihata
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff: Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant: CEO Kazuhiro Nishihata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy v. Fader et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff: Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant: Chief of Staff, Mr. Craig Fader and All Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Shuman et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff: Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant: Ruth Shuman and Any staff member that was involved
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
Mosley v. Gonzalez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: Larry Donnell Mosley
Defendant: A.D. Gonzalez, Lt. S. Carter, David Newcomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner: Darius Donnell Freeman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
(PS) Bledsoe v. Jacot et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: Donnell Bledsoe
Defendant: Katy Jacot, Mark E. Thiel, Pearlie Bledsoe Townes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?