Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Jackson v. Weaver et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Davis, Bridgette Strawser, Eddie Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Andre W Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hughes v. Smith et al
as 7:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Justin Clyde Hughes
Defendant:
RN Mullins, C/O Meredith, Dr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7849
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7846
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Hall v. Smith et al
as 7:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Medical Dept. and Dr. Smith
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidwell v. Bland et al
as 5:2019cv05213
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Healthcare, Mrs. Estella Bland and Dr. Smith
Plaintiff:
David Lee Tidwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rancourt Woodell v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3285
Defendant:
DR. TOBIN, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. LEWIS, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. GOK, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PANDEYA, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. MOHATA, GRATERFORD MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, GOROSIKOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Barnes v. Mullins et al
as 7:2019cv00663
Defendant:
Dr. Mullins and Dr. Smith
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
