Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Williams v. Grace United Methodist Church et al
as 7:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Grace United Methodist Church, City of Wilmington, County of New Hanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Bosco et al
as 3:2010cv08079
Defendant:
Michael A Bosco, Jr, Tiffany & Bosco PA, Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAY v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2009cv00718
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GRAY
Defendant:
BILLY BRYANT, LAKE and WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darron Campbell v. City of Tucson, et al
as 09-15736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRON KEITH CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, CHIEF OF POLICE, Tucson Police Department, TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
GRAYS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80347
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRAYS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gray v. Lafler
as 1:2008cv11915
Petitioner:
Edward Gray
Respondent:
Blaine Lafler
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
GRAY v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GRAY
Defendant:
BILLY BRYANT, LAKE, WHITAKER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 39.5 Acres in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC and others
Defendant:
39.5 Acres in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi, Carsie Lott, Louis Young Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States v. James Gray
as 07-3151
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
James Edward Gray
Campbell v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Darron Keith Campbell
Defendant:
City of Tucson, Chief of Police, Tucson Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
