Cases 31 - 40 of 44
SANCHEZ et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2010cv68848
Plaintiff:
FRANK SANCHEZ and JOSEPHINE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Timothy Bennett v. Avila et al
as 2:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Estate of Timothy Bennett and Estate of Timothy Bennett
Defendant:
Lisa Avila, Susan Nygren, Laura Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00113
Petitioner:
Gilbert Frank Sanchez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. The Board of Eastern New, et al
as 09-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MILBUR DOLEN, ORLANDO CHAVEZ, JOSE CHAVEZ and others
Sanchez v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00836
Petitioner:
Gilbert Frank Sanchez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Sanchez v. Darryl Adams
as 5:2009cv00642
Petitioner:
Frank Sanchez
Respondent:
Darryl Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANCHEZ v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2008cv02512
Petitioner:
FRANK SANCHEZ
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENY and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanchez et al v. Dorochoff
as 1:2008cv02712
Plaintiff:
Frank Sanchez, Laime Mockiene, Gilveta Mockute and others
Defendant:
Ruth Dorochoff and Ruth Dorochoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ridley v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Sanchez and Michael Bluett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridley v. Sanchez et al
as 6:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Sanchez and Michael Bluett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
