Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Adamo v. Romero et al.
as 2:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Adamo
Defendant:
Raymond L. Romero, Davis Rutherford Ruark, Debra Lautenschlager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mason, III v. Clear Creek County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv01917
Plaintiff:
Jah Frederick Nathaniel Mason, III
Defendant:
Clear Creek County Sheriff, Rachel Olguin-Fresquez, Fifth Judicial District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew White v. Steven Dobrescu, et al
as 14-16149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN L. DOBRESCU, STATE OF NEVADA, ROBERT S. BECKETT and others
In re: Jerome Wilson
as 14-1464
Movant:
In re: JEROME WILSON
Respondent:
FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, et al
Wilson #127680 v. Fifth Judicial District Court
as 1:2014cv00271
Petitioner:
Jerome Wilson #127680
Respondent:
Fifth Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
White v. Dobrescu et al
as 3:2013cv00680
Defendant:
Steven L. Dobrescu, Fifth Judicial District COurt, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Town of Silverthorne et al
as 1:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brian Brady
Defendant:
Town of Silverthorne, Fifth Judicial District, Mark Hanschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jensen v. Utah Court of Appeals, et al
as 12-4201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, in and for Washington County, State of Utah and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Johns et al v. Anderson et al
as 0:2012cv02778
Plaintiff:
Leora M. Johns and Connie L. Neal
Defendant:
Gregory J. Anderson, Douglas L. Richards, Dick Fasnacht and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
