Cases 31 - 40 of 239
Ann McLeod v. Austin Welch, et al
as 21-14493
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANN RYLEE MCLEOD
Defendant / Appellant:
AUSTIN WADE WELCH, JOHN GREGORY SKIPPER, SCOTT RAY FONDREN and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Todd Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board, et al
as 21-36052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD, a Public Body, JEFF NELSON, in his individual capacity, BOB FONDREN, in his individual capacity and others
Fondren v. Looney et al
as 1:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Fondren
Defendant:
Jennifer Looney and Joe Almeda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fondren v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Brandon Aaron Fondren
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bridges v. Dowdy et al
as 2:2021cv02096
Defendant:
Guard Alex Fondren, Guard Nathaniel Hicks and Lieutenant Carrie Dowdy
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FONDREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13314
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAY FONDREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. Dowdy et al
as 2:2021cv02066
Defendant:
Guard Alex Fondren, Guard Nathaniel Hicks and Lieutenant Carrie Dowdy
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Gettel et al
as 2:2021cv10175
Defendant:
Gina Gettel, John 3 Doe, Perry Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kerry Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fondren v. Rankin County, MS
as 3:2021cv00042
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Rankin County, MS
Plaintiff:
James Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLeod v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00595
Defendant:
Beau Bartel, Scott Ray Fondren, John Gregory Skipper and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Rylee McLeod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
