Cases 31 - 40 of 3,700
United States of America v. Jackson (Hunter)
as 24-1772
Defendant:
JEROME HUNTER, SYDNEY JACKSON, JOHN KING and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marcus McAdams v. C. Edge
as 24-2360
Plaintiff:
Marcus McAdams
Defendant:
C. Edge, Acting Warden, FCI-Forrest City, Arkansas (Originally named as John P. Yates)
E. v. Fairfax County School Board et al
as 1:2024cv01123
Defendant:
Shante Freeman, Valerie Winter, Lisa S. Forrest and others
Plaintiff:
A. E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Beckham v. ADA's et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Defendant:
Bill Bunting, Teara L. Varnes, Monica LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Dayshawn Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2024at00798
Plaintiff:
Cole Forrester Stanford
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Timothy Nesdahl v. C. Garrett
as 24-2318
Defendant:
C. Garrett, Warden, FCC Forrest City
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Stanford v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2024cv01796
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Cole Forrester Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Carl Gordon v. Fernando Manzano Olguin et al
as 2:2024cv05384
Defendant:
Danielle Jo Forrest, Fernando Manzano Olguin, Diarmuid Fionntain O Scannlian and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Gordon
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL, ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., PRISMA HEALTH GREENVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
