Cases 31 - 40 of 3,335
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 24-40022
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Laura Haney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Haney v. Haines et al
as 7:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Haney
Defendant:
Correctional Officer FNU Haines, Midland County Detention Center, Sheriff David Criner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jimmie Haney
as 23-4726
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JIMMIE LEE BENJAMIN HANEY
Haney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Brandi M. Haney
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sarsour v. ABDELQADER et al
as 1:2023cv16474
Plaintiff:
Haney Sarsour
Defendant:
Said ABDELQADER, Fakhri AJAJ, FADI AJAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Haney et al
as 4:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving and Luke I Chrisco
Defendant:
Fullback Haney and Aaron Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
