Cases 31 - 40 of 286
Lau et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rosebrock, Christopher Jason Rozanski, David William Haalili Lau and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., ZTE (TX) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Prasad v. Pine et al
as 4:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Prasad
Defendant:
Dave Pine, Carole Groom, Don Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horsley v. Sheetz, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Damian Horsley
Defendant:
Sheetz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horsley v. LendingPoint LLC
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Horsley
Defendant:
LendingPoint LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. Horsley et al
as 3:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Julia Horsley and Premier Bookkeeping Group
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gallagher v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv07779
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Gallagher
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, F.M.H. Mental Health, Carlos Bolanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Jones v. Mark Horsley, et al
as 21-2950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARK HORSLEY, individual capacity jointly and severally and SERGEANT DANIEL PORTER, individual capacity jointly and severally
Larry Jones v. Mark Horsley, et al
as 21-2888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARK HORSLEY, individual capacity jointly and severally and SERGEANT DANIEL PORTER, individual capacity jointly and severally
HORSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32295
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HORSLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
