Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Travis McFadden v. FNU Redwitch
as 14-6936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS J. MCFADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU REDWITCH, Nurse, FNU C/O WILLIAMS, Correction Officer and CAROLINA MEDICAL CENTER UNION
Travis McFadden v. Reuben Young
as 13-7650
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS J. MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG
Eastom v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 13-5127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT EASTOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a municipal corporation, JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON, individually and in his official capacity, BRANDON J. MCFADDEN, individually and in his official capacity and others
Demmirio v. McFadden
as 2:2013cv00719
Petitioner:
Hamid Demmirio
Respondent:
J McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McFadden v. Midwest City City of
as 5:2012cv01419
Plaintiff:
Kelley J McFadden
Defendant:
Midwest City City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFadden v. Young
as 5:2012hc02205
Petitioner:
Travis J. McFadden
Respondent:
Reuben Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pickens v. McCabe et al
as 8:2012cv01796
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Pickens , Jr
Defendant:
Wayne McCabe, J McFadden and E Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Wills v. Charles Rosenberg
as 12-6690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDARYL WILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PHILIP ROSENBERG, DONNA MARIE STEPHENSON, JOHN ROBERT STONE and others
ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv07606
Plaintiff:
ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
DENNIS J. MCFADDEN and EILEEN E. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv07607
Plaintiff:
ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
DENNIS J. MCFADDEN and AGNES A. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
