Cases 31 - 40 of 907
Hill v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Hill
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12057
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02863
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ST. JOHN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02333
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BRYAN ST. JOHN, JOHN CHARLES YOUNG II, ESTATE OF JAMES ELLIOTT KEGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
SHEAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21537
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS SHEAF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnette v. Cassidy
as 5:2023hc02167
Petitioner:
John Thomas Barnette
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19429
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19388
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02841
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
