Cases 31 - 40 of 1,205
Smith v. Madery et al
as 2:2023cv12703
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Defendant:
Brian Madery, D. Brassfield, Jennifer Norder and others
Reed v. Office of U.S. Trustee et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Petitioner:
James Reed
Respondent:
Office of U.S. Trustee, Woodbridge Mortgage Investment Fund 1 LLC, Silverleaf Funding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Roe et al
as 1:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe, Jane Roe #1 and Jane Roe #2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. abdlcommunityforus.com et al
as 1:2023cv02527
Defendant:
ABDLCOMMUNITYFORUS.com, ABDL Community, ABDL Community For All and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
URDANETA v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv20596
Cross Defendant:
JANINE L. URDANETA
Cross Claimant:
BENJAMIN F DAVIS and BARNES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), JANE ROE 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Barroso et al v. Corporation X et al
as 3:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Barroso and Luis Soto
Defendant:
CORPORATION X, INSURANCE COMPANY A, Angel Fernando Velez-Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
LNU et al v. Blaha
as 1:2023cv07051
Plaintiff:
"Jenny" LNU, "Carrie" LNU, "Lily" LNU and others
Defendant:
Thomas Blaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
"Jenny" et al v. Blaha
as 2:2023cv07051
Plaintiff:
"Jenny", "Carrie", "Lily" and others
Defendant:
Thomas Blaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
