Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Williams v. S&S Partners et al
as 3:2016cv02018
Plaintiff:
Chris Williams
Defendant:
S&S Partners, Sunil Chandubhai Patel and Sunil Jay Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DIONISIO RAMALES et al v. JAY PATEL and MAYANK RAY
as 2:2016mc00065
Defendant:
JAY PATEL and MAYANK RAY
Plaintiff:
DIONISIO RAMALES , SALVADOR FLORES, ANGEL DIAZ and others
Patel et al v. Amonett
as 3:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Rameshbhai Patel , Pamila Patel , Jai Patel and others
Defendant:
James O. Amonett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chelsea Capital Partners, LLC et al v. Patel et al
as 1:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Capital Partners, LLC and Jay Patel
Defendant:
Mahesh C. Patel and Risha Patel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
BROWN v. PATEL et al
as 3:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS BROWN
Defendant:
JAY PATEL, NARESH PATEL, VISHAL S PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson v. Kitt et al
as 1:2014cv01525
Plaintiff:
Samuel Robinson
Defendant:
Victor V. Kitt, Vi Jay Patel and A. Klang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PTD Enterprise, LLC et al v. Hospitality Trade Program, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01860
Plaintiff:
PTD Enterprise, LLC and Phil Van Wetterling
Defendant:
Hospitality Trade Program, LLC, LHS Gulf Shores, Inc., Jay Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. JAI-DEV ASSOCIATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv01552
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
JAI-DEV ASSOCIATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, JAYANI ASSOCIATES, LLC, JAY PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAM BURGESS v. LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC et al
as 3:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURGESS
Defendant:
LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC , JAY PATEL and NARESH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Jala, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00015
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Jala, Inc., Jay Patel and Nayan Patel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
