Cases 31 - 40 of 377
Katz
as 1:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Stephen Katz
Defendant:
Hampton Hills Associates and Jeffrey Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Katz v. Hampton Hills Associates et al
as 2:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Stephen Katz
Defendant:
Hampton Hills Associates and Jeffrey Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Eskridge v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Eskridge
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allen Brown, T.S. Expediting Services, Inc. and Does One Through Five
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Turner v. Town of Narrows
as 7:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Turner
Defendant:
Town of Narrows
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Reid v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv00974
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Allen Reid
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rudow v. Waite et al
as 4:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Chris Rudow
Defendant:
S Waite, Unknown Alexander, Jeffrey Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
family Witzeman v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey-Allen: family Witzeman and Jeffrey-Allen Witzeman
Defendant:
State of California, Rob Bonta, Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEROY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12739
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN LEROY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Waite et al
as 4:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Robert C Adams
Defendant:
S Waite, Unknown Alexander, Jeffrey Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
