Cases 31 - 40 of 88
McDaniel v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-02316
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. McDaniel
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
McDaniel v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02316
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. McDaniel
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDaniel v. Drysdales, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Mary L McDaniel
Defendant:
Drysdales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. McDaniel and Keith McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hutchinson v. McDaniel et al
as 1:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Keith Monroe Hutchinson
Defendant:
D. L. McDaniel, Knight and Busby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Titan Medical Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10752
Defendant:
James L McDaniel and Titan Medical Enterprises Inc
Plaintiff:
United States of America
McDaniel v. Commonwealth DCSE (Child Support)
as 2:2011cv00631
Petitioner:
Kelvin L. McDaniel
Respondent:
Commonwealth DCSE (Child Support)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Commonwealth DCSE (Child Support)
as 7:2011cv00554
Respondent:
Commonwealth DCSE (Child Support)
Petitioner:
Kelvin L. McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
