Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Rapp et al v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
John Rapp, Megan F Wabnitz and Judith Rapp
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04612
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD SAVAGE
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PIERRE LACOMBE and CORIZON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacombe v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01178
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Annette Lacombe
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacombe v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05353
Plaintiff:
Christian Lacombe
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LACOMBE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26695
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE LACOMBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. LeBlanc
as 21-30315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Lamartinere, Captain, Louisiana State Penitentiary, James LeBlanc, Tracy Falgout and others
Lacombe v. Warden Robert May et al
as 1:2021cv00807
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Petitioner:
Paul K. Lacombe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacombe v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Lenny Lacombe
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Claude Lacombe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correct, et al
as 21-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAUDE P. LACOMBE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Lacombe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01579
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lacombe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
