Cases 31 - 40 of 61
JACKSON v. USA
as 1:2015cv00386
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LANDIS LAMAR JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Collin Jackson
as 13-12492
Petitioner:
In re: COLLIN LAMAR JACKSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00224
Petitioner:
Collin Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01185
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. USA
as 7:2012cv02239
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamar Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. City of El Paso et al
as 3:2012cv00281
Defendant:
City of El Paso, James T. O'Connor, Cristina Quinones and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Lamar Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Christopher Jackson v. US
as 11-7652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Dean et al
as 5:2011cv03942
Plaintiff:
Dentarious Lamar Jackson
Defendant:
Dean, Parker, Morgan County Jail and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Antwan Jackson
as 11-4858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTWAN LAMAR JACKSON, a/k/a Twan, a/k/a Mey-Mey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
