Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LABONTE v. COLVILLE
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
ROBERT J COLVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Labonte v. Christy Wiegand
as 22-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTY C. WIEGAND, Public Official, individual capacity
William Labonte v. Donetta Ambrose, et al
as 22-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE, EMPLOYEE OF DISTRICT COURTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA and MARLA D. TORTORICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE W. DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LABONTE v. CUTLAR
as 2:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
MALIK CUTLAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
LABONTE v. WIEGAND
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE
Defendant:
CRISTY CRISWELL WIEGAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABONTE v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE and MARLA D. TORTORICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Swinton (Smith)
as 22-165
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kareem Swinton, AKA K., Harold Butler, AKA Haas, Edwin DeJesus and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Andre Smith, AKA Dre
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
