Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lambert v. Skilstaf, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00394
Plaintiff: Evelyn M. Lambert
Defendant: Skilstaf, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LAMBERT v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32824
Plaintiff: JOHN M. LAMBERT
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMBERT et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93256
Plaintiff: JERRY D. LAMBERT and MARTHA M. LAMBERT
Defendant: ACANDS, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
May v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2009cv01031
Plaintiff: Judith C May
Defendant: City of Seattle, Jane Doe, Laura Wollberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Contract None
United States of America v. Lambert
as 1:2008cv01284
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Diane M Lambert
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
Barber, et al v. Modavox, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01896
Plaintiff: John E Barber, John E Barber, Samuel Barnes and others
Defendant: Robert D Arkin and Modavox, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lambert v. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00952
Plaintiff: Douglas M. Lambert
Defendant: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. and McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?