Cases 31 - 40 of 10,733
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024fp00148
Petitioner:
Maurice Morlee Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, MAURICE FINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rakestraw v. USA
as 3:2024cv00487
Petitioner:
Maurice Brandon Rakestraw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thompson v. Laurie Sue Baldwin et al DO NOT DOCKET. Inter District Transfer to the Corpus Christi Division.
as 4:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024fp00142
Plaintiff:
Maurice Morlee Johnson-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bunten v. Donat
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BROWN, PATRICIA BUNTEN, TAMIE HOLLINS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DONAT, GEORGE GARRISON, WILLIAM HORTON and others
US v. Maurice Shackleford
as 24-6478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE D. SHACKLEFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
