Cases 31 - 40 of 526
Price et al v. Chippewa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Diane Veen Price, Sherri Rockwell, Daniel Clement and others
Defendant:
Chippewa, County of, Carmen M. Fazzari, Marjorie Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dent v. City of Papillion et al
as 8:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tywanda Dent
Defendant:
The City of Papillion, Robert Morrell and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kenneth Morrell v. USA, et al
as 23-11450
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH L. MORRELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11457
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Morrell v. USA, et al
as 23-11459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. MORRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
