Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Soto et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08644
Plaintiff:
Maria Soto and Manuel Soto
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Manuel Soto-Contrera
as 14-51319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL SOTO-CONTRERAS, also known as Lorenzo Estrada
Soto Del Angel v. USA
as 6:2014cv00017
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Soto Del Angel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SOTO v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2014cv01331
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
KEN CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOTO v. PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2013cv04258
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRENDALEE TRITT, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. Kerestes
as 1:2013cv01916
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
John Kerestes
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Petitioner:
Hector Manuel Soto, Jr.
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General, Brendalee Tritt, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales-Arcadio et al v. Shannon Jr. et al
as 6:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio , Jose Rosalino Antonio-Candelaria , Juan Carlos Flores-Medina and others
Defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr., James G. Shannon, Sr., Cynthia Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Manuel Soto-Roldan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60046
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALBERTO SOTO-ROLDAN, also known as Manuel Soto, also known as Manuel Roldan
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
