Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Mendez v. Radec Corporation
as 12-4845
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Patrick Mendez, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated, Jerry T. Griffo, Jr., Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
Abeck Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Tradesource, Tek Systems, Techengineering Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Radec Corporation, Mark Shortino and Raymond Shortino
Hammond v. Morley et al
as 3:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammond
Defendant:
Kelly Morley and Anthony Cattagio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Orduno v. Little et al
as 6:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Robert Orduno
Defendant:
Susan C Little, Mark Hammond, Robert B. Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Mendez, et al v. The Radec Corp., et al
as 6:2003cv06342
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mendez , Jerry T. Griffo, Jr. , Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
The Radec Corporation , Mark Shortino , Raymond Shortino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Floyd et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03887
Plaintiff:
Joseph Floyd, Joseph Floyd, Alicia Haynes and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc. and Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
El Bey v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2007mi00433
Plaintiff:
Ninti El Bey
Defendant:
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Capital Corporation, Flagstar Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00426
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
