Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Kosiski v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00345
Defendant:
All John and Jane Does known and Unknown, Unknown Armkneckt, Teresa Bittinger and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kosiski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenny v. Bartman et al
as 1:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kenny
Defendant:
Michael John Bartman, Jr., Anthony Michael Ameche, Dan Skorich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Wesley Kenny
as 16-11020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WESLEY SCOTT MICHAEL KENNY, a.k.a. Ray De Leon
Kenny v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04492
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenny
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herman Buckman v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 14-3775
Petitioner:
Herman D. Buckman
Respondent:
State of Nebraska and Michael Kenny, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Neal v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2014cv00354
Respondent:
Michael Kenny, Diane Sabatka-Rhine and The State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Alonzo Neal
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Kenny
as 4:2001cv03069
Interested Party:
Attorney General
Respondent:
Michael Kenny
Petitioner:
Keva Tyree O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jasper v. Kenny et al
as 4:2014cv03200
Plaintiff:
Michael Jasper
Defendant:
Michael Kenny and Diana Rines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenny et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24933
Plaintiff:
Blanca Kenny and Michael Kenny
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenny v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2010cv02910
Defendant:
Police Officer Amadio, Police Officer Raymond and The County of Nassau
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
