Cases 31 - 40 of 1,336
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vonville v. Haidle et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Philip Vonville
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Garry Haidle and Government Of Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Monroe, County of
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Monroe, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cordney Hayes v. Edwin Sabillon, et al
as 24-10905
Plaintiff:
CORDNEY MALLORY HAYES
Defendant:
EDWIN SABILLON, Sergeant, Monroe County Detention Center and SAMUEL CARPENTAR, Deputy, Monroe County Detention Center
Woodford v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Davis, McGary and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Proctor v. Vican et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Ronald E. Vican, Mark Peter Pazauhanich, Donald Fernbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunaj v. Department of Children and Families Monroe County Florida et al
as 4:2024cv10022
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Joy Dunaj
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families Monroe County Florida, Jean Curtis, Susan Margaret Merry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Underwood v. Monroe County Hospital
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Monroe County Jail
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
