Cases 31 - 40 of 2,771
Primo Park LaBrea Titleholde v. Nina Diaz et al
as 2:2024cv01811
Plaintiff:
Primo Park LaBrea Titleholde
Defendant:
Nina Diaz and John Grillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In re Naturalization Ceremony 03/13/24
as 5:2024mc80052
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Refal Hussein Ali Al Mhaoush, Damon Jay Civin and others
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanner-Smith v. State Farm General Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Tania Haley and Nina L. Tanner-Smith
Defendant:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Berkley et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dana Berkley, Nina Pallman, Etoya Garrett and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kiley Revel v. Curtis Farmer et al
as 2:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
Kiley Revel
Defendant:
Curtis Farmer, James Herzog, Nancy Avila and others
County of Pima, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson
as 24-869
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF PIMA and CITY OF TUCSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Interested Party:
NINA ALLEY, as Guardian and Conservator for and on behalf of Louis Taylor, a single man
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Nina Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 9:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Ms. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
