Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,386
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04868
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Negron-Cruz
as 23-1976
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ALEXIS D. NEGRON-CRUZ
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 23-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHAWN JULY
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator
Defendant: J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections, D. SMITH, KENNETH NELSON, Ex-Associate Administrator and others
Negron v. Lumpkin
as 23-50852
Petitioner / Appellant: Antonio J. Negron
Respondent / Appellee: State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Shalamberidze v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al
as 1:2023cv08686
Plaintiff: Besik shalamberidze
Defendant: Central Garden & Pet Company d/b/a Hopewell Nursery, Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P. and Robert V. Negron, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Negron v. Sam et al
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff: Jerry Negron
Defendant: Ms. Sam, Mr. Able, Sgt. Schiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio NegronIn re: Antonio Negron
as 23-50749
Petitioner: In re: Antonio J. Negron
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff: MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant: BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. State of Texas
as 1:2023cv01238
Petitioner: Antonio J. Negron
Respondent: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irizarry et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv08859
Plaintiff: Arlene Irizarry and Christian Negron
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl MDL: Products Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?