Cases 31 - 40 of 202
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corporation
as 20-1086
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Nomura Holdings Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland plc and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
County of Washington, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Portigon AG and others
Plaintiff:
County of Beaver, Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Magnolia Regional Health Center, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, on behalf of UNIQA Dollar Bond and others
Appellant:
Fortinbras Asset Management GmbH
Ford v. ProShares Trust II
as 20-419
Defendant:
Jefferies LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael L. Sapir, Newedge USA LLC, Todd B. Johnson and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lisa Ludovici, Thomas Butler, III and Anthony Ludovici
Plaintiff:
David A. Ford, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
State of Louisiana v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv00638
Defendant:
J. P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., JEFFERIES GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, by and through its Attorney General, JEFF LANDRY and State Of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
American General Life Insurance Company et al v. Schahin II Finance Company (SPV) Limited et al
as 4:2019cv04025
Defendant:
Schahin II Finance Company (SPV) Limited, Nomura Securities International, Inc., Milton Schahin and others
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA, American Home Assurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Montgomery v. Access National Mortgage et al
as 4:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Nomura Securities International Inc, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Does 1-100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald A Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv03711
Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A, Gary McDonald, BNP Paribas and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100 and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis, City of Atlanta Firefighters Pension Fund, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hinojosa v. WestStar Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv02458
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, NA as Trustee for Securitized Trust Ginnie Mae Remic 2012-043 Trust, WestStar Mortgage Corporation, Nomura Securities International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heron H. Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Maia v. Luo et al
as 1:2017cv09796
Plaintiff:
Carlos Maia
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Nomura Securities International, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Kaib Global Fund LP and Chunlei He
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019cv01704
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Pension System Local 103, I.B.E.W., City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System, Local 103, I.B.E.W. Health Benefit Plan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Deerfield Beach Municipal Firefighters Pension Trust Fund and Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
