Cases 31 - 40 of 9,732
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024hc02095
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar Quintero Jimenez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
Oscar Quintero Jimenez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Samtani v. City of Laredo
as 24-40327
Plaintiff:
Manoj R. Samtani, also known as Luvi Samtani, AS Number 1, a Minor Female Child and Anisha Samtani
Defendant:
City of Laredo, Laredo Police Department, Juan Jose Lazcano, III, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Womack v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Oscar Womack, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia Sanchez v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Oscar Santiago Garcia Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DANTZLER v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE H. FOSTER and WILLIAMS DYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Browning et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Oscar Sosa
Defendant:
Ms. Browning, Ms. Stout and Unknown Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01218
Petitioner:
Oscar Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
