Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Stinson v. Officer Jenkins
as 1:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Mickey Carl Stinson
Defendant:
Officer Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of C
as 09-7897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC, BOB ANDERSON and others
Thompson v. Ware et al
as 2:2009cv02353
Plaintiff:
Lynwood Bernard Thompson
Defendant:
Officer Ware, Officer Jenkins and B Zachary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Murphy v. Cert Team Officers et al
as 1:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Darryl Murphy
Defendant:
Cert Team Officers, Sgt Wade, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNCH v. JENKINS et al
as 2:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LYNCH
Defendant:
OFFICER JENKINS, OFFICER MAPES, OFFICER BARNHEART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv01841
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarrett v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00911
Plaintiff:
Stanley T. Jarrett
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Warden Collins, Warden Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Miami Dade County Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv20783
Plaintiff:
Ray Reece
Defendant:
Miami Dade County Corrections, Metro West Correctional Facility, Officer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Noonan et al
as 9:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
Patrick Clifton Clark
Defendant:
William Noonan, Jimmy Lacoste, Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
